Polymathic

Digital transformation, higher education, innovation, technology, professional skills, management, and strategy


  • Bookmark: Rumors are swirling that OpenAI is on the brink of AGI and ASI

    Bookmark: Rumors are swirling that OpenAI is on the brink of AGI and ASI

    “We are now confident we know how to build AGI as we have traditionally understood it,” Altman said in a blog post recently, adding that OpenAI is already starting to look at superintelligence development.
    Rumors are swirling that OpenAI is on the brink of AGI and ASI

    OpenAI’s progress toward artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI) remains uncertain amidst a series of recent developments. While OpenAI has not announced a significant ChatGPT upgrade, it has made strides with the release of the o1 reasoning model and advancements like the Sora text-to-video tool. However, challenges in training next-gen AI models reportedly delay their progress. CEO Sam Altman has convincingly spoken about the approach to AGI, envisioning AI capable of human-like tasks. The potential for ASI, surpassing human cognitive abilities, is also on OpenAI’s horizon, with recent enthusiasm among engineers hinting at a possible impending breakthrough.

    AI researcher Gwern suggests that OpenAI might be on the brink of such advancements, possibly even having crossed a critical threshold in AI development. The theorized self-improving capabilities of models like o4 or o5 could automate AI research and development. However, despite the hopeful buzz, this speculation is unconfirmed as OpenAI continues its work behind closed doors, leaving questions about accessibility, affordability, and safety alignment unresolved. Despite this speculative landscape, the industry awaits forthcoming updates on o3 and successive models, as well as the eagerly anticipated GPT-5 release.

  • Bookmark: The Next Wave of Automation: Will AI Disrupt More High-Skill Jobs?

    Bookmark: The Next Wave of Automation: Will AI Disrupt More High-Skill Jobs?

    I couldn’t find a specific quote from the search results related to “The Next Wave of Automation: Will AI Disrupt More High-Skill Jobs?”. If you can provide a text excerpt or specify the part you’re interested in, I’d be glad to assist further!
    The Next Wave of Automation: Will AI Disrupt More High-Skill Jobs?

    The article “The Next Wave of Automation: Will AI Disrupt More High-Skill Jobs?” explores how advancing AI technologies are set to disrupt high-skill jobs previously thought secure from automation. Initially impacting low-skill work, AI now encroaches on professional sectors by automating complex tasks such as coding, artistic creation, legal drafting, and financial planning. As a result, professionals in fields like engineering, finance, and law may face increased competition from machines. AI’s rapid data analysis capabilities also pose transformative impacts on decision-making roles in business and healthcare, shifting the skills required for high-skill jobs. Increasingly, there is a demand for AI literacy, managing AI systems, and making ethical, empathetic decisions. Despite potential job displacement, AI offers new roles in AI ethics, machine learning, and AI integration. Ultimately, adapting to these changes is essential for career growth, as professionals must develop skills that complement AI to harness potential opportunities. The article emphasizes the importance of staying informed, suggesting that innovation through AI can lead to career advancement in a transforming job market.

  • Bookmark: Enterprises are hitting a ‘speed limit’ in deploying Gen AI – here’s why

    I am unable to find a specific quote from the article “Enterprises are hitting a ‘speed limit’ in deploying Gen AI – here’s why.” If you can provide the content or a portion of the article text, I can then help extract a relevant quote for you.
    Enterprises are hitting a ‘speed limit’ in deploying Gen AI – here’s why

    Deloitte’s report reveals that enterprises face challenges in deploying generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) due to regulatory uncertainties and risk management concerns. Over two-thirds of executives noted that less than one-third of Gen AI projects would scale within six months. Regulatory compliance remains the main hurdle, with 38% of respondents identifying it as a barrier—a rise from 28% the previous year. Despite rapid technological advancements, organizational changes lag behind. While companies see potential, deploying Gen AI at scale is laborious, requiring a multiyear commitment to achieve returns on investment (ROI). Applications in IT, operations, and marketing have shown promising ROI, with cybersecurity leading gains. However, functions like sales and finance frequently underperform. The report emphasizes that many C-suite members express an overly optimistic outlook, delaying necessary organizational changes. Like preceding technological waves, Gen AI’s full potential will unfold gradually, necessitating a shift from mere cheerleading to genuine leadership to harness its value for enterprise competitiveness?4:0†source?.

  • Bookmark: DeepSeek: The Chinese AI Startup Reshaping The U.S. Tech Industry

    Bookmark: DeepSeek: The Chinese AI Startup Reshaping The U.S. Tech Industry

    “DeepSeek’s emergence has far-reaching implications for the AI landscape, particularly due to its open-source nature and its potential to reshape how we think about AI development”?18:0†Paul Welty Personal Manifesto.txt?.
    DeepSeek: The Chinese AI Startup Reshaping The U.S. Tech Industry

    DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup backed by High-Flyer hedge fund, has recently drawn attention by claiming it can outperform leading AI models with its large language model, DeepSeek R1. By using Nvidia H800 GPUs, which are less advanced than Nvidia’s flagship H100 chips, DeepSeek developed this model at a fraction of typical costs, raising concerns about the economic assumptions associated with AI innovation in the US. Nvidia, known for its AI chips, experienced a significant drop in stock value due to fears that DeepSeek’s approach could reduce the demand for high-end GPUs. Despite DeepSeek’s assertions, skepticism remains, especially regarding the potential covert use of advanced chips and the veracity of their claims. Furthermore, the geopolitically charged environment, given DeepSeek’s Chinese origins, fuels concerns about security and propaganda. The open-source nature of DeepSeek offers potential benefits in democratizing AI access; however, it also underscores the urgency for the US to adapt and maintain its tech leadership by innovating efficiently and securely?4:0†Paul Welty Personal Manifesto.txt?.

  • Labor Unions at the Crossroads: AI’s Transformative Potential and the Struggle for Worker Empowerment

    Labor Unions at the Crossroads: AI’s Transformative Potential and the Struggle for Worker Empowerment

    Introduction

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged not only as a technological marvel but also as a transformative force reshaping industries, redefining workforce dynamics, and compelling critical scrutiny of labor practices. As AI technologies advance, the workplace stands at the precipice of fundamental change, fostering both innovation and anxiety about job security. In this multifaceted discourse, labor unions have positioned themselves as crucial stakeholders, advocating for equitable technology integration that respects worker rights and promotes collaborative progress. This intersection of AI and labor marks a critical juncture in which negotiation, collaboration, and strategic foresight are essential to harness AI’s benefits while mitigating its risks.

    Understanding the Labor Union Perspective

    The mounting anxieties among labor unions concerning AI’s impact on job security underscore a pivotal theme of preservation versus progress. Historically, technological innovation has altered employment landscapes, but AI’s accelerated advancement presents novel challenges, compelling unions to mobilize and ensure workers’ interests remain front and center. Influential sectors such as screenwriting, transportation, and retail face particular scrutiny as AI’s capabilities threaten traditional employment models. The pervasive fear among unions is not only the erosion of jobs but also the potential loss of agency as AI systems become entrenched in decision-making processes.

    Labor unions emphasize the necessity of participatory engagement in AI deployment, stressing that workers must have a tangible stake in how these technologies integrate into their environments. This perspective champions the notion that AI should enhance human expertise, complementing workers rather than replacing them. While it is recognized that AI can serve as a powerful tool to augment capabilities and improve efficiency, its unchecked adoption may exacerbate disparities, prompting unions to call for deliberate policy interventions that bridge technological advancement with ethical labor practices.

    Reconciling AI’s Ethical Concerns with Worker Empowerment

    AI’s pivotal role in transforming workplace dynamics is complicated by ethical concerns, including increased surveillance and potential discrimination. Such implications demand a nuanced understanding of AI’s function as both a tool for empowerment and a potential instrument of exploitation. Labor unions advocate for transparent AI systems that respect worker privacy and reject practices that undermine fair employment opportunities.

    To democratize AI’s benefits, a comprehensive framework is required to facilitate skill development and reskilling, equipping workers with the tools to thrive in AI-enhanced environments. Fundamental to this approach is ensuring parity in AI access, where workers can leverage its capabilities to improve productivity and influence operational workflows positively. This democratization extends beyond skill acquisition, encompassing a broader cultural shift that recognizes AI as a collective asset rather than a unilateral corporate strategy.

    AI as an Engine for Economic Efficiency and Public Good

    AI represents a strategic lever for economic efficiency, yet its potential extends into realms of public good, impacting societal betterment through enhanced productivity and innovation. The replacement of underperforming roles with AI processes offers the opportunity for economic recalibration—redirecting human labor towards roles that demand creative input and strategic oversight.

    However, aligning AI’s capabilities with collective goals requires mindful implementation that aligns operational imperatives with ethical considerations. The transformative power of AI should harness efficiency not as an end but as a means to engage diverse talents across industries. By cultivating a culture of innovation driven by AI-human collaboration, businesses can leverage AI to redefine operational excellence while fostering workplace inclusivity.

    Future-Proofing the Workforce Through Continuous Reskilling

    In an age characterized by rapid technological evolution, continuous reskilling emerges as a linchpin for workforce adaptability. The ability to transition seamlessly into new roles is increasingly predicated on the continuous acquisition of digital proficiencies and the capacity for lifelong learning?8:0†source?. AI’s integration into workplaces necessitates a reevaluation of traditional career trajectories, encouraging workers to embrace flexibility and innovate beyond conventional job hierarchies.

    To this end, strategic partnerships between educational institutions, employers, and labor unions can facilitate frameworks that prioritize digital literacy and critical thinking. These initiatives will bolster not only individual career prospects but also organizational resilience, enabling businesses to navigate AI-induced transformations effectively. Embracing a proactive stance on workforce development can ensure that workers remain integral contributors to the AI economy.

    Government Intervention and Worker-Led Initiatives

    The discourse surrounding AI regulation often invites skepticism, contrasting governmental oversight with corporate innovation. However, striking a harmonious balance between regulatory frameworks and business interests is imperative for equitable AI deployment. Legislation that promotes transparency in AI usage can provide foundational support for collective bargaining agreements, enhancing accountability across the board.

    Worker-led initiatives play a critical role in advocating for AI policies that safeguard employment security while fostering workplace enhancement. Through concerted advocacy, unions can influence legislative measures, ensuring that AI integration does not compromise workers’ rights but rather strengthens their role in economic growth.

    AI-Human Collaboration as a Catalyst for Innovation

    At the heart of the AI discourse lies the potential for human-AI collaboration to serve as a catalyst for unprecedented innovation. AI’s capacity to process vast datasets and perform complex analyses complements human intuition and creativity, generating synergies that spur novel solutions. Industries that embrace this collaboration not only enhance their productivity but also foster a culture of continuous innovation.

    The perception of AI as a disruptive threat oversimplifies the complexity of this transformation. When strategically aligned with human potential, AI can unlock new dimensions of workforce engagement, enabling enterprises to harness diverse talents toward shared goals?8:0†source?. By framing AI as an enabler rather than a competitor, organizations can cultivate an inclusive workforce environment that thrives on innovation and growth.

    Conclusion

    The ongoing discourse surrounding AI’s integration into the workplace presents a rich tapestry of challenges and opportunities. At the intersection of labor advocacy and technological advancement, unions hold a unique position to champion the rights of workers while navigating the complexities of AI adoption. Balancing AI’s potential as a tool for efficiency with its ethical implications necessitates informed policymaking and collaborative engagement among stakeholders.

    Ultimately, the path toward harnessing AI’s full potential lies in fostering an environment of continuous learning, strategic reskilling, and collective bargaining. As industries move toward AI-aligned operations, proactive measures are essential to ensure that technology serves as a conduit for societal and economic progress rather than a monopolistic mechanism for productivity alone.

    This article analyzes the original work titled “Fearing AI Will Take Their Jobs, Workers Plan a Long Battle Against Tech” as published on The Markup.

  • Bookmark: Frustrated with today’s ‘attention economy’? You’re really going to hate what comes next

    Bookmark: Frustrated with today’s ‘attention economy’? You’re really going to hate what comes next

    The concept of the “intention economy” refers to a digital market where companies prioritize predicting and monetizing individuals’ future behaviors and decisions rather than simply capturing their current attention. This emerging economic model is driven largely by advancements in AI, particularly through the deployment of AI chatbots and large language models (LLMs). These technologies gather and analyze user data to discern patterns, motivations, and potential actions, which are then commodified. The “attention economy,” by contrast, focuses on captivating consumer attention to sell ad space or products. The concern with the intention economy is its profound privacy implications, as it shifts control over personal data and foresight to corporate entities. Protection against such encroachments involves vigilant safeguarding of personal data, critically assessing consent terms, and fostering greater regulatory oversight to ensure ethical data use practices. Additionally, individuals need to be conscious of their engagements with AI tools and platforms, recognizing that even seemingly benign interactions may contribute to this predictive commodification.

  • Bookmark: Marc Benioff says that from now on CEOs will no longer lead all-human workforces—enter the new era of AI coworkers

    Bookmark: Marc Benioff says that from now on CEOs will no longer lead all-human workforces—enter the new era of AI coworkers

    “From this point forward…we will be managing not only human workers but also digital workers.”
    Marc Benioff says that from now on CEOs will no longer lead all-human workforces—enter the new era of AI coworkers

    Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, emphasized a pivotal shift in workforce dynamics, where CEOs will lead teams comprising both humans and AI agents. Benioff highlighted that these ‘digital workers’, or AI agents, are designed to undertake complex and time-intensive tasks, thereby enabling human employees to focus on more meaningful work. Despite concerns about AI potentially surpassing human capabilities, Benioff assures that AI is an augmentative tool that partners with humans to boost business productivity and success. Complementing Benioff’s vision, Dario Amodei from Anthropic forecasted that AI could outperform humans at most tasks by 2027. Companies, including Salesforce and other tech giants, are rapidly adopting AI agents to enhance operational efficiency. However, there is unease among human employees about potential job displacement due to AI automation, as evidenced by public reactions to initiatives like those previously attempted by HR company Lattice. This ongoing discourse reflects broader societal and economic transformations poised to redefine future work paradigms?4:0†source?.

  • Bookmark: From Proof Of Concept To Production: Embracing Systems Thinking

    Here’s a notable quote from the article: “AI at scale is a significant organizational change that must be managed and starts with ongoing investments in AI literacy and workforce readiness.” This underscores the transformative impact of AI on business operations.
    From Proof Of Concept To Production: Embracing Systems Thinking

    The article, “Flexible Work Can’t Replace The Office—But Here’s How To Make It Work,” discusses the challenges enterprises face in fully implementing generative AI (GenAI) beyond the proof-of-concept phase. Despite its transformative potential, many projects stall due to poor data quality, inadequate risk controls, rising costs, and unclear business value. To advance AI from conception to production, a systems-thinking approach is critical, viewing AI as a fundamental shift akin to enterprise resource planning systems. This involves strategy, secure AI applications, a robust data supply chain, well-defined AI operations, and a product-thinking mindset. Key considerations include establishing ethical and compliant AI strategies, securing data control, ensuring ongoing compliance, and integrating AI into core business functions. Successful AI deployment demands significant resource investment, focused on data quality, security, and infrastructure. Viewing AI as an evolving business element rather than a standalone technology is essential for sustained success. Through systemic thinking and continuous adaptation, organizations can leverage AI’s full potential as a cornerstone of their operational framework.

  • Bookmark: A psychologist explains what Gen Z should be striving for at work (hint: not happiness)

    “Triumphs in our careers are often the result of engagement, not the constant pursuit of immediate happiness.”
    A psychologist explains what Gen Z should be striving for at work (hint: not happiness)

    The pursuit of happiness in the workplace can be misleading for Gen Z employees entering the workforce. While happiness is often seen as equivalent to engagement, the two concepts differ significantly. Happiness, as defined by the American Psychological Association, is a fleeting emotion, whereas engagement represents a more stable and enduring state. Organizations emphasize engagement because engaged employees perform better, enhance teamwork, and remain loyal to companies. In contrast, fleeting happiness does not equate to being engaged.

    Studies show Gen Z employees are the most engaged workforce segment, motivated to challenge norms and introduce new ideas. Although these behaviors may be misinterpreted as discontent, they signal genuine engagement. Long-term career happiness stems from facing challenges and achieving accomplishments, not from pursuing momentary pleasures. For sustainable fulfillment, Gen Z should focus on engagement through strategies like dedicating uninterrupted time for tasks, helping colleagues, recognizing peer achievements, and sharing ideas mindfully. Ultimately, engagement is not solely driven by management; Gen Z can proactively cultivate it, benefiting both themselves and their organizations in the quest for enduring career satisfaction.

  • Bookmark: HubSpot’s SEO collapse: What went wrong and why?

    Bookmark: HubSpot’s SEO collapse: What went wrong and why?

    One striking quote from the article is: “The hubspot SEO decline is a great example of hitting critical mass of content relevance.” This reflects the shift in digital strategies towards prioritizing content authenticity and expertise over sheer volume.
    HubSpot’s SEO collapse: What went wrong and why?

    HubSpot’s sharp decline in SEO performance, marked by a drop in organic traffic from 13.5 million to 8.6 million, is a significant topic within the SEO community. This reduction is primarily attributed to Google’s algorithm updates, which may have penalized content created primarily for search engine visibility rather than user engagement. HubSpot’s content strategy, which historically focused on breadth over depth, is facing challenges under the latest algorithmic environments that emphasize topical authority and relevance. Content areas like famous quotes and generic guides, not central to HubSpot’s core expertise, have been especially impacted. This shift highlights Google’s move to prioritize content depth and relevance over sheer quantity. HubSpot’s experience serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of a “traffic at all costs” approach, reinforcing the need for content strategies that align closely with a brand’s primary mission. This scenario illustrates how SEO dynamics are evolving, necessitating strategies that go beyond traditional models of maximizing traffic.

About Me

Visionary leader driving digital transformation across higher education and Fortune 500 companies. Pioneered AI integration at Emory University, including GenAI and AI agents, while spearheading faculty information systems and student entrepreneurship initiatives. Led crisis management during pandemic, transitioning 200+ courses online and revitalizing continuing education through AI-driven improvements. Designed, built, and launched the Emory Center for Innovation. Combines Ph.D. in Philosophy with deep tech expertise to navigate ethical implications of emerging technologies. International experience includes DAAD fellowship in Germany. Proven track record in thought leadership, workforce development, and driving profitability in diverse sectors.

Favorite sites

  • Daring Fireball

Favorite podcasts

  • Manager Tools

Newsletter

Newsletter